Per Curiam

[et_pb_section fb_built=”1″ theme_builder_area=”post_content” _builder_version=”4.19.2″ _module_preset=”default”][et_pb_row _builder_version=”4.19.2″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_column _builder_version=”4.19.2″ _module_preset=”default” type=”4_4″ theme_builder_area=”post_content”][et_pb_text _builder_version=”4.19.2″ _module_preset=”default” theme_builder_area=”post_content” hover_enabled=”0″ sticky_enabled=”0″]

A unanimous decision by an appellate court with more than one judge but in which no particular judge takes credit as the author of the decision. 

When you see a decision “per curiam” you won’t see a particular judged named as the judge who “delivered” the opinion.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]